MichaelMahemoff
|
|
Your trail: |
Difference between version 5 and version 4:
Line 1 was replaced by line 1 |
- [http://mahemoff.com] |
+ Home: [http://mahemoff.com] Blog/Podcast: [http://softwareas.com] |
Line 3 was replaced by line 3 |
- My attitude to methodologies is simple: know a broad range of approaches, and then be pragmatic in evolving them to suit your needs. XP, Crystal, RUP, Classic Waterfall and all the rest have something to contribute. |
+ My attitude to methodologies is simple: know a broad range of approaches, and then be pragmatic in evolving them to suit your needs. XP, Crystal, RUP, Classic Waterfall, even code 'n' fix, all have something to contribute. Just be cautious about using any one of them in its pure form. |
Line 8 was replaced by line 8 |
- * Compared to other agile approaches, it is very explicit. Not all of its concrete practices apply to a particular project, but the explicit approach makes it clear to follow and renders it suitable for evaluation and customisation. |
+ * Where most agile methodologies consist only of basic principles, XP is very explicit on the practices that should be followed. Not all of its concrete practices apply to a particular project, but the explicit approach makes it clear to follow and renders it suitable for evaluation and customisation. |
Back to MichaelMahemoff, or to the Page History.
|